Use of strcasestr

2010-04-13 Thread Tomas Carnecky
On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did gyre > and gimble: > > TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you > introduced > TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec

Use of strcasestr

2010-04-13 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did gyre and gimble: TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you introduced TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr TC> instead of strcasestr for

Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Aaron Ecay
--- 2010ko Apirilak 12an, Tomas Carnecky-ek idatzi zuen: > > Adding that function to compat/ probably is the way to go, but the whole > compat mechanism doesn't work here. It's like if compat/Makefile.local was > not included in the top-level makefile, notmuch_compat_srcs is empty > there. Any

Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:04:39 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > > > Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did > > gyre and gimble: > > > > TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) > > you

Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Tomas Carnecky
In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04). Is strcasestr really necessary there or can it be replaced with strstr? tom

Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:58:10 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you > introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch > reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04). > > Is strcasestr

Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Tomas Carnecky
In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04). Is strcasestr really necessary there or can it be replaced with strstr? tom

Re: Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:58:10 +0200, Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com wrote: In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04). Is

Re: Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when t...@dbservice.com did gyre and gimble: TC In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you introduced TC strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr TC instead of strcasestr for portability.,

Re: Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Tomas Carnecky
On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when t...@dbservice.com did gyre and gimble: TC In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you introduced TC strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use

Re: Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Aaron Ecay
--- 2010ko Apirilak 12an, Tomas Carnecky-ek idatzi zuen: Adding that function to compat/ probably is the way to go, but the whole compat mechanism doesn't work here. It's like if compat/Makefile.local was not included in the top-level makefile, notmuch_compat_srcs is empty there. Any ideas

Re: Use of strcasestr

2010-04-12 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:04:39 +0200, Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com wrote: On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when t...@dbservice.com did gyre and gimble: TC In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06)