another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-11 Thread David Edmondson
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > In fact, I'm now starting to think we don't need to add any support > for special tagging operations (such as "deleted") even if we *do* > have support for suppressing them in the CLI. Special tagging > operations should only be

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner > wrote: > > Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me > > that it represents a pretty fundamental divergence between the CLI and > > the emacs

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-11 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 11 at 7:16 am: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner > > wrote: > > > Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me > > > that it represents a

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me > that it represents a pretty fundamental divergence between the CLI and > the emacs interface. Mind you, I guess one could make the same argument > about the libs

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:23 +, David Edmondson wrote: > I honestly don't understand the reason for this. If someone wants to not > see messages that they have tagged as 'deleted', they add 'and not > tag:deleted' to the end of the search expression. Adding "and not tag:deleted" in all of

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:23 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:28:10 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. > > In particular, I include a patch that creates a new customization > >

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread David Edmondson
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:28:10 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. > In particular, I include a patch that creates a new customization > variable, notmuch-search-exclude-deleted, that will exclude any > messages with the

Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread David Edmondson
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:28:10 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. In particular, I include a patch that creates a new customization variable, notmuch-search-exclude-deleted, that will exclude any

Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:23 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:28:10 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. In particular, I include a patch that creates a new

Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:23 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: I honestly don't understand the reason for this. If someone wants to not see messages that they have tagged as 'deleted', they add 'and not tag:deleted' to the end of the search expression. Adding and not tag:deleted in

Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me that it represents a pretty fundamental divergence between the CLI and the emacs interface. Mind you, I guess one could make the same argument about

Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me that it represents a pretty fundamental divergence

Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-10 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 11 at 7:16 am: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me that it

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-07 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
So, after many stabs at adding the ability to "delete" messages in emacs [0], and the corresponding heated discussions, I'm throwing another attempt into the fray. I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. In particular, I include a patch that creates a new

another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

2012-01-07 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
So, after many stabs at adding the ability to delete messages in emacs [0], and the corresponding heated discussions, I'm throwing another attempt into the fray. I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. In particular, I include a patch that creates a new customization