(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-26 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:26 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there > > are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index > > files if I recall correctly). > > Can you describe what the specific problems

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Tim Gray
On Apr 25, 2011 at 01:27 PM -0700, Carl Worth wrote: >Can you describe what the specific problems are here? It would be great >to fix notmuch to work well in this scenario. That sounds like a sensible fix to me. But I am running notmuch on a maildir tree that does have dovecot files floating

tracking non-mail files [was: Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages]

2011-04-25 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:59:06 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > This is actually related to an issue that I have that I wanted to bring > up at some point. For some reason I occasionally receive mail (spam) > that is not properly formatted but that my MTA delivers anyway that > notmuch

tracking non-mail files [was: Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages]

2011-04-25 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:41:28 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Though, even if that were the only problem, we could just teach notmuch > to remember that particular files were detected as not-email to fix the > performance problem without requiring any user configuration. This is actually related to an

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:56:31 -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > That sounds like a sensible fix to me. But I am running notmuch on a > maildir tree that does have dovecot files floating around in it (I use > sieve to deliver my mail to folders) and notmuch doesn't seem to have > much of a problem

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Carl Worth
> My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there > are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index > files if I recall correctly). Can you describe what the specific problems are here? It would be great to fix notmuch to work well in this scenario.

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Carl Worth
My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index files if I recall correctly). Can you describe what the specific problems are here? It would be great to fix notmuch to work well in this scenario.

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:56:31 -0400, Tim Gray tg...@protozoic.com wrote: That sounds like a sensible fix to me. But I am running notmuch on a maildir tree that does have dovecot files floating around in it (I use sieve to deliver my mail to folders) and notmuch doesn't seem to have much of

tracking non-mail files [was: Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages]

2011-04-25 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:41:28 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Though, even if that were the only problem, we could just teach notmuch to remember that particular files were detected as not-email to fix the performance problem without requiring any user configuration. This is actually

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:26 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index files if I recall correctly). Can you describe what the specific

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread servilio
On 18 April 2011 16:26, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: By giving notmuch new a path to a message in the store:  notmuch new /path/to/message By feeding notmuch new a message on stdin, and then

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-20 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:18:15 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:29:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. Dumb question: are procmail and IMAP "closed > > to friends" ? I would think yes but only on server side, right or > > wrong ? > > "Closed to

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-20 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:18:15 +0200, Michael Radziej m...@spieleck.de wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:29:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote: Thank you for your answer. Dumb question: are procmail and IMAP closed to friends ? I would think yes but only on server side, right or wrong ?

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Radziej
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:29:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > Thank you for your answer. Dumb question: are procmail and IMAP "closed > to friends" ? I would think yes but only on server side, right or > wrong ? "Closed to friends?" No idea what you mean. Can you please describe your mail flow?

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:44:35 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:22:37 +0200, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > Do you think this could be done directly in a SIEVE script ? > > Probably not, but you could with procmail. SIEVE does not allow > execution of user provided

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Michael Radziej
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:22:37 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > Do you think this could be done directly in a SIEVE script ? Probably not, but you could with procmail. SIEVE does not allow execution of user provided binaries. Kind regards Michael

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Austin Clements
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > By giving "notmuch new" a path to a message in the store: > > ?notmuch new /path/to/message > > By feeding "notmuch new" a message on stdin, and then having it write > the message to a specified location: > > ?notmuch new

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:44:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi Florian! > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf > wrote: > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > >

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:17:40 -0400, Tom Prince wrote: > On 2011-04-17, Pieter Praet wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:23:44 -0400, Tom Prince > > wrote: > > > > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > > > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:17:40 -0400, Tom Prince tom.pri...@ualberta.net wrote: On 2011-04-17, Pieter Praet wrote: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:23:44 -0400, Tom Prince tom.pri...@ualberta.net wrote: Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a WAITING tag (or similar)

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:44:06 +0200, Michael Radziej m...@spieleck.de wrote: Hi Florian! On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:44:35 +0200, Michael Radziej m...@spieleck.de wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:22:37 +0200, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: Do you think this could be done directly in a SIEVE script ? Probably not, but you could with procmail. SIEVE does not allow

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Austin Clements
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: By giving notmuch new a path to a message in the store:  notmuch new /path/to/message By feeding notmuch new a message on stdin, and then having it write the message to a specified location:  notmuch

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-17 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:23:44 -0400, Tom Prince wrote: > > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > > answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through > > > some

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-17 Thread Tom Prince
On 2011-04-17, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:23:44 -0400, Tom Prince > wrote: > > > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > > > answer. Currently I set this manually.

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-17 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:57:07 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through > > some indicators

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-17 Thread Michael Radziej
Hi Florian! On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through > some

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-16 Thread Tom Prince
> > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through > > some indicators via message mode or similar means? e.g.: > > > > <#notmuch

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with > notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in > "/home/cfl/mail/sent" via Fcc. This can be configured with the variable

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in /home/cfl/mail/sent via Fcc. This can be configured with the variable

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-16 Thread Tom Prince
Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through some indicators via message mode or similar means? e.g.: #notmuch tag=WAITING

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-16 Thread Michael Radziej
Hi Florian! On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-14 Thread Florian Friesdorf
With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in "/home/cfl/mail/sent" via Fcc. In order for it to be seen by notmuch I then need to run: notmuch new and for it to be tagged as sent: notmuch tag +sent --

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-14 Thread Florian Friesdorf
With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in /home/cfl/mail/sent via Fcc. In order for it to be seen by notmuch I then need to run: notmuch new and for it to be tagged as sent: notmuch tag +sent --