[PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:03 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with > > `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah... > > I'm a no-ido person. > > > >

[PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +, David Edmondson wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet > > wrote: > > > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into > > > `notmuch', > > > eliminating the

[PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch', > > eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind. > > The lisp-ier-ness changes are good. > >

[PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread David Edmondson
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with > `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah... I'm a no-ido person. > > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable. > > > > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings

[PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch', eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind. FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at runtime. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 34 -- 1 files changed, 8

[PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread David Edmondson
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch', > eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind. The lisp-ier-ness changes are good. I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want to go back to

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread David Edmondson
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch', eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind. The lisp-ier-ness changes are good. I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread David Edmondson
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah... I'm a no-ido person. Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable. FYI: causes 2 compile

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:03 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah... I'm a