On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:03 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
> > `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah...
>
> I'm a no-ido person.
>
> > >
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into
> > > `notmuch',
> > > eliminating the
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
> > eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
>
> The lisp-ier-ness changes are good.
>
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
> `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah...
I'm a no-ido person.
> > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.
> >
> > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings
CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at runtime.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 34 --
1 files changed, 8
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
> eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
The lisp-ier-ness changes are good.
I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want to go back
to
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
The lisp-ier-ness changes are good.
I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
`org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah...
I'm a no-ido person.
Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.
FYI: causes 2 compile
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:03 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
`org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah...
I'm a