On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:49:23 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Writing code to manipulate and use a structure like this would obviously
> be some effort, but it doesn't seem overly difficult. More challenging
> would be the interface to allow the user to customise the structure to
> express their in
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:45:20 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> So I think what we actually want here is an additional member for our
> saved-search tuple which indicates the desired search order for that
> particular search. That's the only way I see to support a single user
> who wants to take advantage
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:49:23 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Writing code to manipulate and use a structure like this would obviously
> be some effort, but it doesn't seem overly difficult. More challenging
> would be the interface to allow the user to customise the structure to
> express their in
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:45:20 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> So I think what we actually want here is an additional member for our
> saved-search tuple which indicates the desired search order for that
> particular search. That's the only way I see to support a single user
> who wants to take advantage
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> Keith happens to use saved searches only for subsets of his inbox and in
> that case, it makes a lot of sense to see the results of all of these
> messages in an oldest-first order.
Hi,
I used saved searches mostly this way until a few days ago, when I wro
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> Keith happens to use saved searches only for subsets of his inbox and in
> that case, it makes a lot of sense to see the results of all of these
> messages in an oldest-first order.
Hi,
I used saved searches mostly this way until a few days ago, when I wro
On Tue, 04 May 2010 12:02:22 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:58:27 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown
> > oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want
> > to see the most recent me
On Tue, 04 May 2010 12:02:22 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:58:27 -0700, Keith Packard
> wrote:
> > I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown
> > oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want
> > to see the most recent
On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:58:27 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown
> oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want
> to see the most recent messages first. This patch makes these two
> default search orders sep
On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:58:27 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown
> oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want
> to see the most recent messages first. This patch makes these two
> default search orders sep
I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown
oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want
to see the most recent messages first. This patch makes these two
default search orders separate.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el
I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown
oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want
to see the most recent messages first. This patch makes these two
default search orders separate.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el
12 matches
Mail list logo
