> notmuch-search.c | 453
> +++
> 1 file changed, 326 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Hi for such a large patch this was surprisingly easy to follow (though I
am not saying I have worked through all the details). However, there are
some
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>
> Can we not just dump this output format once and
Sorry, the original patch I sent was missing a small part, here the full
patch:
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included.
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
>> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
>> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
>> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>>
>>
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
Can we not just dump this output format once and for all? Does anything
use it? And if so can we just modify
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, craven at gmx.net wrote:
> Sorry, the original patch I sent was missing a small part, here the full
> patch:
>
> As discussed in , this patch adds
> support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
> stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the
Sorry, the original patch I sent was missing a small part, here the full
patch:
As discussed in id:20120121220407.gk16...@mit.edu, this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer
notmuch-search.c | 453
+++
1 file changed, 326 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Hi for such a large patch this was surprisingly easy to follow (though I
am not saying I have worked through all the details). However, there are
some
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
Can we not just dump this output format once and for all? Does anything
use it? And if
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
Can we not just dump this output
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
different (and that a significant chunk of
11 matches
Mail list logo
