[PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

2011-12-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:11:41 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed > previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless > and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is not worth > indexing the

Re: [PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

2011-12-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:11:41 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is

[PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

2011-12-27 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Dec 27 at 9:11 am: > It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed > previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless > and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is not worth > indexing the encrypted content, just as

[PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

2011-12-27 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is not worth indexing the encrypted content, just as it's not worth indexing the signatures in signed parts. ---

[PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

2011-12-27 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is not worth indexing the encrypted content, just as it's not worth indexing the signatures in signed parts. ---

Re: [PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

2011-12-27 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Dec 27 at 9:11 am: It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is not worth indexing the encrypted content, just as it's