[PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Michal Sojka [2010.04.12.1347 +0200]: > > > Wouldn't it be better to postpone synchronisation of the tags > > > until after emacs is done with the message? > > > > Theoretically, it would be possible, but if, for some reason, the > >

[PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michal Sojka [2010.04.12.1347 +0200]: > > Wouldn't it be better to postpone synchronisation of the tags > > until after emacs is done with the message? > > Theoretically, it would be possible, but if, for some reason, the > synchronization step would not happen, then the tags in the

[PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Michal Sojka [2010.04.08.1713 +0200]: > >I'm working on the solution - if the mailstore cannot open the > >message with the name passed, it tries different names with > >different maildir flags. > > Wouldn't it be better to

[PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michal Sojka [2010.04.08.1713 +0200]: >I'm working on the solution - if the mailstore cannot open the >message with the name passed, it tries different names with >different maildir flags. Wouldn't it be better to postpone synchronisation of the tags until after emacs is

Re: [PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz [2010.04.08.1713 +0200]: I'm working on the solution - if the mailstore cannot open the message with the name passed, it tries different names with different maildir flags. Wouldn't it be better to postpone synchronisation of the tags until

Re: [PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz [2010.04.08.1713 +0200]: I'm working on the solution - if the mailstore cannot open the message with the name passed, it tries different names with different maildir flags. Wouldn't it be

Re: [PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz [2010.04.12.1347 +0200]: Wouldn't it be better to postpone synchronisation of the tags until after emacs is done with the message? Theoretically, it would be possible, but if, for some reason, the

[PATCH] Mailstore abstraction v4 - part 2 (maildir synchronization)

2010-04-08 Thread Michal Sojka
This is the second part of mailstore abstraction patches. I do not want this to be merged yet, but there might be some people interested in testing this. This patch adds a mailstore, which bi-directionally synchronizes certain tags with maildir flags. I use it already four weeks and it works