Tomi Ollila writes on juni 11, 2016 19:09:
On Sat, Jun 11 2016, Gaute Hope wrote:
Maybe we could check if the search string contains a regexp and decide
whether to pre-process it on the background of that? I think that would
make the interface more user-friendly. You'd just always use search
wh
On Sat, Jun 11 2016, Gaute Hope wrote:
> David Bremner writes on juni 10, 2016 13:09:
>> Gaute Hope writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Cool!
>>>
>>> Would it break a lot of things if you just replace the original prefix?
>>
>> It would change the matching behaviour. I guess there are people that
>> like the c
Gaute Hope writes:
>
> Maybe we could check if the search string contains a regexp and decide
> whether to pre-process it on the background of that? I think that would
> make the interface more user-friendly. You'd just always use search
> whether you decide that you need to put in some regexp or
David Bremner writes on juni 10, 2016 13:09:
Gaute Hope writes:
Cool!
Would it break a lot of things if you just replace the original prefix?
It would change the matching behaviour. I guess there are people that
like the current "sloppy" matching of from: and subject:. In my
not-very-scie
the idea is that you can run
% notmuch search re:subject:
% notmuch search re:from:'
or
% notmuch search subject:"your usual phrase search"
% notmuch search from:"usual phrase search"
This should also work with bindings, since it extends the query parser.
This is trivial to extend for other va
Tomi Ollila writes:
> On Fri, Jun 10 2016, David Bremner wrote:
>
>> David Bremner writes:
>> and of course everywhere it says #ifdef HAVE_XAPIAN_FIELD_PROCESSOR, is
>> should say #if.
>
> ... is there a static code analyzer which notices such a mistakes... ?
It seems tough for a static analy
On Fri, Jun 10 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> +#ifdef HAVE_XAPIAN_FIELD_PROCESSOR
>> +delete notmuch->from_re_field_processor;
>> +notmuch->from_re_field_processor = NULL;
>> +delete notmuch->subject_re_field_processor;
>> +notmuch->subject_re_field_proce
Gaute Hope writes:
>
> Cool!
>
> Would it break a lot of things if you just replace the original prefix?
It would change the matching behaviour. I guess there are people that
like the current "sloppy" matching of from: and subject:. In my
not-very-scientific tests, it is a factor of 5 to 10 tim
David Bremner writes on juni 10, 2016 4:28:
the idea is that you can run
% notmuch search subject_re:
% notmuch search from_re:'
or
% notmuch search subject:"your usual phrase search"
% notmuch search from:"usual phrase search"
This should also work with bindings, since it extends the query p
David Bremner writes:
> +#ifdef HAVE_XAPIAN_FIELD_PROCESSOR
> +delete notmuch->from_re_field_processor;
> +notmuch->from_re_field_processor = NULL;
> +delete notmuch->subject_re_field_processor;
> +notmuch->subject_re_field_processor = NULL;
> +#endif
and of course everywhere it
the idea is that you can run
% notmuch search subject_re:
% notmuch search from_re:'
or
% notmuch search subject:"your usual phrase search"
% notmuch search from:"usual phrase search"
This should also work with bindings, since it extends the query parser.
This is trivial to extend for other va
11 matches
Mail list logo
