David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
From: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Amended by David Bremner: combine lexical-let
Hi
From: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Amended by David Bremner: combine lexical-let and let into
lexical-let*
This
From: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Amended by David Bremner: combine lexical-let and let into
lexical-let*
---
David Edmondson d...@dme.org writes:
On Sat, Nov 29 2014, Charles Celerier wrote:
Should use a `let' binding rather than `setq'. Otherwise, looks good.
(lexical-let
((completions
(append (list folder: path: thread: id: date: f
What about using lexical-let* to combine the
Just updated the patch to use lexical-let as suggested. I'm not too
familiar with emacs-lisp, so please tell me if you had something else in
mind.
charles
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
David Edmondson d...@dme.org writes:
On Sat, Nov 29 2014, Charles Celerier wrote:
Should use a
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Signed-off-by: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Sat, Nov 29 2014, Charles Celerier wrote:
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Signed-off-by: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 8
