On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:52:51 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> What do you think about the approach in
>
> id:"1309422050-23241-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org"
>
> I sortof like the idea of having with and without prefix bindings.
That seems like a totally reasonable solution to me.
> Or m
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:52:51 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> What do you think about the approach in
>
> id:"1309422050-23241-1-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"
>
> I sortof like the idea of having with and without prefix bindings.
That seems like a totally reasonable solution to me.
> O
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> This modifies the notmuch-show "c i" binding to yank just the
> message-id to the kill-ring, without the "id:" prefix. This makes
> this yank binding consistent with the rest of the yank bindings in
> that they don't include any s
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> This modifies the notmuch-show "c i" binding to yank just the
> message-id to the kill-ring, without the "id:" prefix. This makes
> this yank binding consistent with the rest of the yank bindings in
> that they don't include any
On Fri 28 Oct 2011 14:06, Daniel Schoepe writes:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:52:59 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
>> In point of fact, do we need these quotes around message IDs at all?
>> Can message IDs have characters that would need to be escaped for the
>> shell?
>
> Message ID syntax i
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:52:59 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> In point of fact, do we need these quotes around message IDs at all?
> Can message IDs have characters that would need to be escaped for the
> shell?
Message ID syntax is defined in RFC 2822[1]:
> message-id = "Message-
On Fri 28 Oct 2011 14:06, Daniel Schoepe writes:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:52:59 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
>> In point of fact, do we need these quotes around message IDs at all?
>> Can message IDs have characters that would need to be escaped for the
>> shell?
>
> Message ID syntax i
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:52:59 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> In point of fact, do we need these quotes around message IDs at all?
> Can message IDs have characters that would need to be escaped for the
> shell?
Message ID syntax is defined in RFC 2822[1]:
> message-id = "Message
On Thu 27 Oct 2011 05:52, Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:46:43 +0200, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
>> wrote:
>> > (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
>> >"Return the message id of the current message."
>> >
On Thu 27 Oct 2011 05:52, Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:46:43 +0200, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
>> wrote:
>> > (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
>> >"Return the message id of the current message."
>> >
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:46:43 +0200, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
> >"Return the message id of the current message."
> > - (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\""))
> > + (con
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:46:43 +0200, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
> >"Return the message id of the current message."
> > - (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:46:43 +0200, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
> >"Return the message id of the current message."
> > - (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\""))
> > + (con
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:46:43 +0200, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
> >"Return the message id of the current message."
> > - (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\
Hi!
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
>"Return the message id of the current message."
> - (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\""))
> + (concat "\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\""))
Shouldn't the double quo
Hi!
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id ()
>"Return the message id of the current message."
> - (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\""))
> + (concat "\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\""))
Shouldn't the double qu
This modifies the notmuch-show "c i" binding to yank just the
message-id to the kill-ring, without the "id:" prefix. This makes
this yank binding consistent with the rest of the yank bindings in
that they don't include any search term prefixes. This is a more
natural interface and will cause less
This modifies the notmuch-show "c i" binding to yank just the
message-id to the kill-ring, without the "id:" prefix. This makes
this yank binding consistent with the rest of the yank bindings in
that they don't include any search term prefixes. This is a more
natural interface and will cause less
18 matches
Mail list logo
