On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:49 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:34:51 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> > wrote:
> > > +(if (re-search-backward "-- " nil t)
> >
> > Maybe `message-signature-separator' rather than the literal
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:14:49 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:34:51 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> > wrote:
> > > +(if (re-search-backward "-- " nil t)
> >
> > Maybe `message-signature-separator' rather than the literal
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> +(if (re-search-backward "-- " nil t)
Maybe `message-signature-separator' rather than the literal "-- " here.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:34:51 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > +(if (re-search-backward "-- " nil t)
>
> Maybe `message-signature-separator' rather than the literal "-- "
> here.
Good catch. Dirk did say he was almost sure he had
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:34:51 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > +(if (re-search-backward "-- " nil t)
>
> Maybe `message-signature-separator' rather than the literal "-- "
> here.
Good catch. Dirk did say he was almost sure he had
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> +(if (re-search-backward "-- " nil t)
Maybe `message-signature-separator' rather than the literal "-- " here.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
pgpGVKmR23JJQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:39:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > This appears not to have gone out??? Must be that weird MUA that I'm
> > using...
>
> Strange. I couldn't find it earlier, and now I have both versions
> here. So blame me, (or
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:39:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > This appears not to have gone out??? Must be that weird MUA that I'm
> > using...
>
> Strange. I couldn't find it earlier, and now I have both versions
> here. So blame me, (or
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> This appears not to have gone out??? Must be that weird MUA that I'm
> using...
Strange. I couldn't find it earlier, and now I have both versions
here. So blame me, (or the weird MUA that I'm using...).
> The existing code inserts the sig
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> This appears not to have gone out??? Must be that weird MUA that I'm
> using...
Strange. I couldn't find it earlier, and now I have both versions
here. So blame me, (or the weird MUA that I'm using...).
> The existing code inserts the si
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:28:33 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:31:49 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> > > 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cur
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:28:33 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:31:49 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> > > 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cur
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:28:33 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:31:49 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> > > 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cur
For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
'To:' field. For replies, leave the cursor at the start of the
body. In all cases, mark the buffer as not modified so that the user
is not prompted if she decides to immediately kill the buffer.
---
emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 32
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:28:33 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:31:49 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> > > 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cur
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:31:49 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> > 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cursor at the start of the
> > body. In all cases, mark the buffer as
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:31:49 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> > 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cursor at the start of the
> > body. In all cases, mark the buffer a
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cursor at the start of the
> body. In all cases, mark the buffer as not modified so that the user
> is not prompted if she decides t
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:25 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
> 'To:' field. For replies, leave the cursor at the start of the
> body. In all cases, mark the buffer as not modified so that the user
> is not prompted if she decides t
For composing new messages and forwarding, leave the cursor on the
'To:' field. For replies, leave the cursor at the start of the
body. In all cases, mark the buffer as not modified so that the user
is not prompted if she decides to immediately kill the buffer.
---
emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 32
20 matches
Mail list logo