[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson wrote: > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered > to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means > that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the > headers are visible. pushed.

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the headers are visible.

[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-31 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson wrote: > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered > to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means > that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the > headers are visible. > --- >

[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-31 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:32:12 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:25:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson wrote: > > > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered > > > to be

[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-31 Thread David Edmondson
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:25:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson wrote: > > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered > > to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means > > that it is visible

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-31 Thread David Edmondson
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:25:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered to be part of the body rather than part of the headers.

[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-30 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson wrote: > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered > to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means > that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the > headers are visible. This

[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-30 Thread David Edmondson
The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the headers are visible. --- I'm interested in getting feedback on this. Unless you run with

[PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body.

2012-01-30 Thread David Edmondson
The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the headers are visible. --- I'm interested in getting feedback on this. Unless you run with