order (unread, inbox, sent mail, all mail).
Sorting by name would put all mail first, even though it's the one I use
least often.
-
--
Adam Wolfe Gordon
--
View this message in context:
http://notmuch.198994.n3.nabble.com/PATCH-emacs-Sort-saved-searches-tp3304068p3304466.html
Sent from
t:
http://notmuch.198994.n3.nabble.com/PATCH-emacs-Sort-saved-searches-tp3304068p3313863.html
Sent from the notmuch mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-Sort-saved-searches-tp3304068p3313863.html
Sent from the notmuch mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:21:44 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hmm. Let's look at this from another perspective: do you know if there's
> a reasonable way to make ordering of the customized saved searches
> easier? It's not exactly user friendly to move items up and down in the
> list. Or to sort
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 00:57:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I personally think it's nice the way it is, such that the entry order in
> the customization variable is the display order. Users can then set the
> order however they prefer.
Hmm. Let's look at this from another perspective: do
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:56:09 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri 02 Sep 2011 15:28, Jani Nikula writes:
>
> > Display saved searches sorted, like tags are displayed.
> >
> > This only affects the display of the saved searches, not the order in which
> > they are stored in .emacs.
> >
> >
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 01:02:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Well, this is obviously easy to customize... and indeed I've got a ready
> patch to do just that... but I've been told before to avoid
> customization and prefer sane defaults instead. So which do we want,
> really? If you want sorting
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 00:57:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I personally think it's nice the way it is, such that the entry order in
the customization variable is the display order. Users can then set the
order however they prefer.
Hmm. Let's look at this from
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:21:44 +0300, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
Hmm. Let's look at this from another perspective: do you know if there's
a reasonable way to make ordering of the customized saved searches
easier? It's not exactly user friendly to move items up and down in the
list. Or
On Fri 02 Sep 2011 15:28, Jani Nikula writes:
> Display saved searches sorted, like tags are displayed.
>
> This only affects the display of the saved searches, not the order in which
> they are stored in .emacs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
> ---
Fun! I reveresed the sorting order so I got
On Fri 02 Sep 2011 15:28, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
Display saved searches sorted, like tags are displayed.
This only affects the display of the saved searches, not the order in which
they are stored in .emacs.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org
---
Fun! I reveresed the
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:56:09 +0300, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@nixu.com wrote:
On Fri 02 Sep 2011 15:28, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
Display saved searches sorted, like tags are displayed.
This only affects the display of the saved searches, not the order in which
they are stored
Display saved searches sorted, like tags are displayed.
This only affects the display of the saved searches, not the order in which
they are stored in .emacs.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Display saved searches sorted, like tags are displayed.
This only affects the display of the saved searches, not the order in which
they are stored in .emacs.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
14 matches
Mail list logo