Mark Walters writes:
> We use message-send-hook for two things -- tagging drafts deleted, and
> tagging replied the parent message of a reply. We should not use
> message-send-hook as that will affect gnus etc too. Moreover,
> message-send-hook is run before the message is sent, even before the
>
Mark Walters writes:
> Hi
>
>> Would it be possible to concatenate the two lists and only call
>> notmuch-tag once? It seems like that should be notably faster.
>
> I think that it's not possible as they are tagging different
> messages. We could probably do something with --batch but that would
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, David Bremner wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>> +(let (tag-change
>> + post-send-tag-changes)
>> + ;; post-send-tag-changes are tag-changes to apply after sending,
>> + ;; but we need to store them now as the compose buffer is
>> + ;; typically kille
Mark Walters writes:
> +(let (tag-change
> + post-send-tag-changes)
> + ;; post-send-tag-changes are tag-changes to apply after sending,
> + ;; but we need to store them now as the compose buffer is
> + ;; typically killed before message-send-and-exit returns.
> + (p
We use message-send-hook for two things -- tagging drafts deleted, and
tagging replied the parent message of a reply. We should not use
message-send-hook as that will affect gnus etc too. Moreover,
message-send-hook is run before the message is sent, even before the
user confirms they want to send
