Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> (Hmm, I hope no-one got confused that the trick was mine and not yours :)
>
> So, the patch you provided in github would be good...
>
> Tomi
>
Hi Gang;
This ruby portability patch seems to have stalled. What is the current
proposal?
d
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes:
(Hmm, I hope no-one got confused that the trick was mine and not yours :)
So, the patch you provided in github would be good...
Tomi
Hi Gang;
This ruby portability patch seems to have stalled. What is the current
proposal?
d
On Tue, May 15 2012, Ali Polatel wrote:
> 2012/5/13 Austin Clements :
>> Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at .8:12 pm:
>>> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
>>> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
>>> keyword always allocates
2012/5/13 Austin Clements :
> Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at ?8:12 pm:
>> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
>> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
>> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
>>
On Tue, May 15 2012, Ali Polatel a...@exherbo.org wrote:
2012/5/13 Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu:
Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at .8:12 pm:
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:12:44PM +0300, Tomi Ollila
wrote:
> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
> these
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:12:44PM +0300, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi
wrote:
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at 8:12 pm:
> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
> these modules fails due to
Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at 8:12 pm:
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate symbols.
This change uses some macro trickery
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate symbols.
This change uses some macro trickery
11 matches
Mail list logo
