On Tue, Apr 02 2019, Örjan Ekeberg wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>> two things
>>
>> - I wonder whether we could drop (defun notmuch-message-mark-replied ()...)
>> - why is it needed for backward compatibility ?
>
> Yes, it would be cleaner to simply remove it. My thought was that there
> is a
Tomi Ollila writes:
> two things
>
> - I wonder whether we could drop (defun notmuch-message-mark-replied ()...)
> - why is it needed for backward compatibility ?
Yes, it would be cleaner to simply remove it. My thought was that there
is a slight risk that someone is explicitly using or
On Sat, Mar 30 2019, Örjan Ekeberg wrote:
> These patches implement a message-send-hook which uses a buffer-local variable
> to tag replied and forwarded messages.
>
> The first patch replaces the current heuristic hook for detecting reply
> messages with an explicit setting when the reply is
On Sat 2019-03-30 22:48:19 +0100, Örjan Ekeberg wrote:
> These patches implement a message-send-hook which uses a buffer-local variable
> to tag replied and forwarded messages.
>
> The first patch replaces the current heuristic hook for detecting reply
> messages with an explicit setting when the
These patches implement a message-send-hook which uses a buffer-local variable
to tag replied and forwarded messages.
The first patch replaces the current heuristic hook for detecting reply
messages with an explicit setting when the reply is composed.
The second patch adds the corresponding
