On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
> This allows for the user to control the order that results are
> returned from saved-searches, (and independently from the order of all
> other searches which is controlled by notmuch-search-oldest-first).
> ---
>
> This allows me to get back to the
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
This allows for the user to control the order that results are
returned from saved-searches, (and independently from the order of all
other searches which is controlled by notmuch-search-oldest-first).
---
This allows me to get back to
These (fairly unpolished) patches add support for defining the sort order
for each saved search individually. The approach is very low-tech and
simple; providing a separate alist which maps saved search names with sort
order for the saved searches that should have a sort order overriding the
Would it be better to include sorting options in the query string?
Then it could just be stored in the saved search, and used outside
saved searches.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> These (fairly unpolished) patches add support for defining the sort order
> for each saved
These (fairly unpolished) patches add support for defining the sort order
for each saved search individually. The approach is very low-tech and
simple; providing a separate alist which maps saved search names with sort
order for the saved searches that should have a sort order overriding the
Would it be better to include sorting options in the query string?
Then it could just be stored in the saved search, and used outside
saved searches.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
These (fairly unpolished) patches add support for defining the sort order
for
