david at tethera.net writes:
> From: David Bremner
>
> This is essentially cosmetic, since success=0 is promised by
> the comments in tag-utils.h.
Pushed this one patch.
Both of the two I pushed from this series are really nothing to do with
batch tagging, and were just cluttering things up.
d
da...@tethera.net writes:
> From: David Bremner
>
> This is essentially cosmetic, since success=0 is promised by
> the comments in tag-utils.h.
Pushed this one patch.
Both of the two I pushed from this series are really nothing to do with
batch tagging, and were just cluttering things up.
d
__
From: David Bremner
This is essentially cosmetic, since success=0 is promised by
the comments in tag-utils.h.
---
tag-util.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tag-util.c b/tag-util.c
index e4e5dda..ca12b3b 100644
--- a/tag-util.c
+++ b/tag-util.c
@@ -40,1
From: David Bremner
This is essentially cosmetic, since success=0 is promised by
the comments in tag-utils.h.
---
tag-util.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tag-util.c b/tag-util.c
index e4e5dda..ca12b3b 100644
--- a/tag-util.c
+++ b/tag-util.c
@@ -40,1