Re: [PATCH 1/2] cli: convert notmuch_bool_t to stdbool

2017-10-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2017-10-07 11:44:04 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our > own, except in the library interface for backward > compatibility. Convert the cli and test binaries to stdbool. +1 LGTM. I'd also be interested in contemplating a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cli: convert notmuch_bool_t to stdbool

2017-10-07 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, Oct 07 2017, Jani Nikula wrote: > C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our > own, except in the library interface for backward > compatibility. Convert the cli and test binaries to stdbool. +2 (i.e. +1 for both patches). I trust the changes works... > --- >

[PATCH 1/2] cli: convert notmuch_bool_t to stdbool

2017-10-07 Thread Jani Nikula
C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our own, except in the library interface for backward compatibility. Convert the cli and test binaries to stdbool. --- command-line-arguments.c | 58 +++ command-line-arguments.h | 10 ---