On Sat 2017-10-07 11:44:04 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our
> own, except in the library interface for backward
> compatibility. Convert the cli and test binaries to stdbool.
+1 LGTM.
I'd also be interested in contemplating a
On Sat, Oct 07 2017, Jani Nikula wrote:
> C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our
> own, except in the library interface for backward
> compatibility. Convert the cli and test binaries to stdbool.
+2 (i.e. +1 for both patches). I trust the changes works...
> ---
>
C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our
own, except in the library interface for backward
compatibility. Convert the cli and test binaries to stdbool.
---
command-line-arguments.c | 58 +++
command-line-arguments.h | 10 ---