Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Jan 31 at 3:26 am:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:25 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > This is all code movement and a smidgen of glue. This moves the
> > existing text formatter code into one self-recursive function, but
> > doesn't change any of the logic. The next p
Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Jan 31 at 3:26 am:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:25 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > This is all code movement and a smidgen of glue. This moves the
> > existing text formatter code into one self-recursive function, but
> > doesn't change any of the logic. The next patc
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:25 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> This is all code movement and a smidgen of glue. This moves the
> existing text formatter code into one self-recursive function, but
> doesn't change any of the logic. The next patch will actually take
> advantage of what the new struc
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:25 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> This is all code movement and a smidgen of glue. This moves the
> existing text formatter code into one self-recursive function, but
> doesn't change any of the logic. The next patch will actually take
> advantage of what the new struc
This is all code movement and a smidgen of glue. This moves the
existing text formatter code into one self-recursive function, but
doesn't change any of the logic. The next patch will actually take
advantage of what the new structure has to offer.
Note that this patch retains format_headers_mess
This is all code movement and a smidgen of glue. This moves the
existing text formatter code into one self-recursive function, but
doesn't change any of the logic. The next patch will actually take
advantage of what the new structure has to offer.
Note that this patch retains format_headers_mess
