Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: add known broken tests for from: and subject:

2019-08-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, Aug 21 2019, David Bremner wrote: > Given we want 'a b' to parse as 'a AND b', then for any > probabilistic (free text) prefix foo:, we should also get 'foo:a > foo:b' expanding to 'foo:a AND foo:b'. Currently this is not true due > to the implimentation of regex fields. implementation

[PATCH 1/3] test: add known broken tests for from: and subject:

2019-08-21 Thread David Bremner
Given we want 'a b' to parse as 'a AND b', then for any probabilistic (free text) prefix foo:, we should also get 'foo:a foo:b' expanding to 'foo:a AND foo:b'. Currently this is not true due to the implimentation of regex fields. --- test/T760-implicit-operators.sh | 28