On Sat, Jan 03 2015, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> I noticed that the (out of date) list of subcommands was simply
>> repeating the summary lines from the manpage. Since those summary
>> lines are already kept in machine readable form in doc/conf.py,
>> it's easy to compute t
David Bremner writes:
> I noticed that the (out of date) list of subcommands was simply
> repeating the summary lines from the manpage. Since those summary
> lines are already kept in machine readable form in doc/conf.py,
> it's easy to compute that part of the completion file.
I meant to annota
I noticed that the (out of date) list of subcommands was simply
repeating the summary lines from the manpage. Since those summary
lines are already kept in machine readable form in doc/conf.py,
it's easy to compute that part of the completion file.
---
completion/Makefile.local | 12 -
On Sat, Jan 03 2015, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> I noticed that the (out of date) list of subcommands was simply
>> repeating the summary lines from the manpage. Since those summary
>> lines are already kept in machine readable form in doc/conf.py,
>> it's easy to compute t
David Bremner writes:
> I noticed that the (out of date) list of subcommands was simply
> repeating the summary lines from the manpage. Since those summary
> lines are already kept in machine readable form in doc/conf.py,
> it's easy to compute that part of the completion file.
I meant to annota
I noticed that the (out of date) list of subcommands was simply
repeating the summary lines from the manpage. Since those summary
lines are already kept in machine readable form in doc/conf.py,
it's easy to compute that part of the completion file.
---
completion/Makefile.local | 12 -