On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:56:13 -0400, Antoine Beaupr?
wrote:
> the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by
> notmuch new/tag/restore.
>
> for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by
> default) but this could be extended to allow the user to
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:56:13 -0400, Antoine Beaupré anar...@koumbit.org wrote:
the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by
notmuch new/tag/restore.
for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by
default) but this could be extended to allow the
the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by
notmuch new/tag/restore.
for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by
default) but this could be extended to allow the user to configure which
flags are allowed to be synchronized.
the reason why only T is
the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by
notmuch new/tag/restore.
for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by
default) but this could be extended to allow the user to configure which
flags are allowed to be synchronized.
the reason why only T is