[PATCH 2/2] lib: add 'safe' setting for flags

2012-01-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:56:13 -0400, Antoine Beaupr? wrote: > the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by > notmuch new/tag/restore. > > for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by > default) but this could be extended to allow the user to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib: add 'safe' setting for flags

2012-01-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:56:13 -0400, Antoine Beaupré anar...@koumbit.org wrote: the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by notmuch new/tag/restore. for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by default) but this could be extended to allow the

[PATCH 2/2] lib: add 'safe' setting for flags

2011-07-17 Thread Antoine Beaupré
the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by notmuch new/tag/restore. for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by default) but this could be extended to allow the user to configure which flags are allowed to be synchronized. the reason why only T is

[PATCH 2/2] lib: add 'safe' setting for flags

2011-07-16 Thread Antoine Beaupré
the 'safe' setting needs to be 'true' for flags to be manipulated by notmuch new/tag/restore. for now, only the (T)rash tag is configurable and set to false (by default) but this could be extended to allow the user to configure which flags are allowed to be synchronized. the reason why only T is