On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:05:45 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
> functionality.
>
> `test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a lisp expression to
> evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
> fails and the outpu
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:05:45 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
> functionality.
>
> `test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a lisp expression to
> evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
> fails and the outpu
Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
functionality.
`test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a lisp expression to
evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
fails and the output is reported to the tester.
---
As per Dmitry:
- don't call `test_ski
Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
functionality.
`test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a lisp expression to
evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
fails and the output is reported to the tester.
---
As per Dmitry:
- don't call `test_ski
