[PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test.

2011-09-05 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:29:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -", is not > actually a real date. 05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a > Tuesday. Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri" > as the day for this string

Re: [PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test.

2011-09-05 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:29:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -", is not > actually a real date. 05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a > Tuesday. Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri" > as the day for this strin

[PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test.

2011-06-05 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -", is not actually a real date. 05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a Tuesday. Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri" as the day for this string, even if "Tue" is specified. Also, the time zone "-" is actually alw

[PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test.

2011-06-05 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -", is not actually a real date. 05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a Tuesday. Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri" as the day for this string, even if "Tue" is specified. Also, the time zone "-" is actually alw