On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 25 at 3:26 pm:
>> On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
>>
>> > Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
>> > which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
>> > out-of-memory
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
> which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
> out-of-memory errors for archival mboxes. Now we explicitly reject
> multi-message mboxes. For historical reasons,
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 25 at 3:26 pm:
> On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> > Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
> > which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
> > out-of-memory errors for archival mboxes. Now we explicitly reject
Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
out-of-memory errors for archival mboxes. Now we explicitly reject
multi-message mboxes. For historical reasons, we retain support for
single-message mboxes, but
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
out-of-memory errors for archival mboxes. Now we explicitly reject
multi-message mboxes. For
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 25 at 3:26 pm:
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
out-of-memory errors for archival mboxes. Now we
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 25 at 3:26 pm:
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led
Previously, we would treat multi-message mboxes as one giant email,
which, besides the obvious incorrect indexing, often led to
out-of-memory errors for archival mboxes. Now we explicitly reject
multi-message mboxes. For historical reasons, we retain support for
single-message mboxes, but
