On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:53 PM David Bremner wrote:
>
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> >>
> >> Is this assuming that the sort order in the CLI is the same as in the
> >> library / bindings? that seems a bit fragile if so.
> >
> > Both the CLI and the bindings are using the same libnotmuch library.
Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
>> Is this assuming that the sort order in the CLI is the same as in the
>> library / bindings? that seems a bit fragile if so.
>
> Both the CLI and the bindings are using the same libnotmuch library.
> If neither of them specify a sort order, the default sort order
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 7:32 AM David Bremner wrote:
>
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > We don't need to check for the order here, that is done in another test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
> > ---
> > test/T395-ruby.sh | 12
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8
Felipe Contreras writes:
> We don't need to check for the order here, that is done in another test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
> ---
> test/T395-ruby.sh | 12
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/T395-ruby.sh b/test/T395-ruby.sh
> index
We don't need to check for the order here, that is done in another test.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
test/T395-ruby.sh | 12
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/T395-ruby.sh b/test/T395-ruby.sh
index e828efed..9298bc9e 100755
---
