On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:35:02 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth David Bremner on Nov 12 at 11:13 am:
> > On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag'
> > > ("+"/"-"),
> > > `notmuch-search-operate-all'
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:35:02 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth David Bremner on Nov 12 at 11:13 am:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag'
(+/-),
Quoth David Bremner on Nov 12 at 11:13 am:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' ("+"/"-"),
> > `notmuch-search-operate-all' ("*") should operate on matching threads
> > instead of matching messages.
> >
>
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' ("+"/"-"),
> `notmuch-search-operate-all' ("*") should operate on matching threads
> instead of matching messages.
>
As far as I can tell, the follow-up series for the race
Quoth David Bremner on Nov 12 at 11:13 am:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' (+/-),
`notmuch-search-operate-all' (*) should operate on matching threads
instead of matching messages.