> Quoth David Bremner on Jul 13 at 11:20 am:
>> Austin Clements writes:
>>
>> > The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's
>> > patch. Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while
>> > dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.
>>
>> I'm not really
Austin Clements writes:
> The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's
> patch. Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while
> dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.
I'm not really looking for a solution for my own use, just wearing my
integration
Quoth David Bremner on Jul 13 at 11:20 am:
> Austin Clements writes:
>
> > The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's
> > patch. Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while
> > dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.
>
> I'm not really looking f
> Quoth David Bremner on Jul 13 at 11:20 am:
>> Austin Clements writes:
>>
>> > The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's
>> > patch. Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while
>> > dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.
>>
>> I'm not really
Quoth David Bremner on Jul 13 at 11:20 am:
> Austin Clements writes:
>
> > The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's
> > patch. Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while
> > dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.
>
> I'm not really looking f
Austin Clements writes:
> The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's
> patch. Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while
> dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.
I'm not really looking for a solution for my own use, just wearing my
integration
Quoth David Bremner on Jul 12 at 4:31 pm:
> David Edmondson writes:
>
> > Extended the saved search definition to allow the inclusion of an
> > accelerator key for the search. Bind 'j' in the common mode map as a
> > leader for such accelerator keys.
>
> I was trying this out without configurin
Quoth David Bremner on Jul 12 at 4:31 pm:
> David Edmondson writes:
>
> > Extended the saved search definition to allow the inclusion of an
> > accelerator key for the search. Bind 'j' in the common mode map as a
> > leader for such accelerator keys.
>
> I was trying this out without configurin
David Edmondson writes:
> Extended the saved search definition to allow the inclusion of an
> accelerator key for the search. Bind 'j' in the common mode map as a
> leader for such accelerator keys.
I was trying this out without configuring any accelerators and it seemed
a bit unfriendly. After
David Edmondson writes:
> Extended the saved search definition to allow the inclusion of an
> accelerator key for the search. Bind 'j' in the common mode map as a
> leader for such accelerator keys.
I was trying this out without configuring any accelerators and it seemed
a bit unfriendly. After
On Mon, 12 May 2014, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, May 10 2014, Aaron Ecay wrote:
>> 2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> This version looks good to me.
>>>
>>> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
>>> in notmuch-go and this uses
On Mon, 12 May 2014, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, May 10 2014, Aaron Ecay wrote:
>> 2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> This version looks good to me.
>>>
>>> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
>>> in notmuch-go and this uses
On Sat, May 10 2014, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> 2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This version looks good to me.
>>
>> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
>> in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g
>> because it wa
On Sat, May 10 2014, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> 2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This version looks good to me.
>>
>> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
>> in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g
>> because it wa
Hello,
2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hi
>
> This version looks good to me.
>
> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
> in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g
> because it wasn't bound and matched gmail's shortcut.
Hello,
2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hi
>
> This version looks good to me.
>
> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
> in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g
> because it wasn't bound and matched gmail's shortcut.
Hi
This version looks good to me.
The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g
because it wasn't bound and matched gmail's shortcut.
Personally I like j (as it starts fewer words than g) and given that w
Hi
This version looks good to me.
The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g
in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g
because it wasn't bound and matched gmail's shortcut.
Personally I like j (as it starts fewer words than g) and given that w
Extended the saved search definition to allow the inclusion of an
accelerator key for the search. Bind 'j' in the common mode map as a
leader for such accelerator keys.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 5 -
emacs/notmuch-lib.el | 46 ++
2 files change
Extended the saved search definition to allow the inclusion of an
accelerator key for the search. Bind 'j' in the common mode map as a
leader for such accelerator keys.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 5 -
emacs/notmuch-lib.el | 46 ++
2 files change
20 matches
Mail list logo