Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu writes:
This change is mostly a question of consistency, since the unique name
is arbitrary anyway. But since most people use timestamps, and that was
the original intention here as well, we might as well.
pushed.
d
On Thu, Jun 14 2012, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Previously, the timestamp at the beginning of the FCC unique maildir
> name was derived incorrectly, thanks to an integer overflow. This
> changes the derivation of timestamp to use a float, and so will get
> the number correct at least until 2038.
Previously, the timestamp at the beginning of the FCC unique maildir
name was derived incorrectly, thanks to an integer overflow. This
changes the derivation of timestamp to use a float, and so will get
the number correct at least until 2038. (It is still formatted with
"%d" so it will show up as
