[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-05-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as > me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition. I think my plugin is a bit further. And yeah, competition is good, but also collaboration; hopefully the 3 plugins can

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-05-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote: sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition. I think my plugin is a bit further. And yeah, competition is good, but also collaboration; hopefully the 3

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-05-02 Thread Anton Khirnov
Hi, sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition. On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:36:56 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-05-02 Thread Anton Khirnov
Hi, sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition. On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:36:56 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-04-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, ? wrote: >>> branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the >>> vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-04-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM,  an...@khirnov.net wrote: branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-04-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, ? wrote: >> branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the >> vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim syntax dir and run >> :NMVimpy() in vim. You'll need vim with

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-04-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, wrote: > branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the > vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim syntax dir and run > :NMVimpy() in vim. You'll need vim with python support and > python-notmuch bindings. I gave this a try,

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-04-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, an...@khirnov.net wrote: branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim syntax dir and run :NMVimpy() in vim. You'll need vim with python support and python-notmuch bindings. I

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-04-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM,  an...@khirnov.net wrote: branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim syntax dir and run

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-16 Thread Anton Khirnov
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:34:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:08 +0100, Anton Khirnov > wrote: > > Yes, it's still synchronous. I suppose making it asynchronous shouldn't > > be all that hard, i just never found enough time and motivation for that > > (it was

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-16 Thread Anton Khirnov
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:34:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:08 +0100, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote: Yes, it's still synchronous. I suppose making it asynchronous shouldn't be all that hard, i just never found enough time and

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-15 Thread Anton Khirnov
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, anton at khirnov.net wrote: > > > > The advantages over current vim client are still the following: > > * sending and displaying/saving attachments > > * much better unicode support > > * tag name and

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-15 Thread Anton Khirnov
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, an...@khirnov.net wrote: The advantages over current vim client are still the following: * sending and displaying/saving attachments * much better unicode support * tag name

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-14 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, anton at khirnov.net wrote: > > The advantages over current vim client are still the following: > * sending and displaying/saving attachments > * much better unicode support > * tag name and search commands completion > * proper representation of the thread

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-14 Thread an...@khirnov.net
Hi, this is a followup to my mail from spring where i presented a partial rewrite of the vim plugin using python. There weren't many comments back then, so I hope there will be more now. I've changed the filenames so my version now coexists with the current vim plugin. You can find it in

[RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-14 Thread anton
Hi, this is a followup to my mail from spring where i presented a partial rewrite of the vim plugin using python. There weren't many comments back then, so I hope there will be more now. I've changed the filenames so my version now coexists with the current vim plugin. You can find it in

Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II

2012-01-14 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, an...@khirnov.net wrote: The advantages over current vim client are still the following: * sending and displaying/saving attachments * much better unicode support * tag name and search commands completion * proper representation of the thread structure *