[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-13 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Quoting Sepp Tannhuber (2012-09-12 16:17:45) > my abook is working now. I don't know why it did not yesterday. Probably it > was > not a bug but rather something stupid with my config. Neither bug nor stupid config! It did not work because the completion is case sensitive. Is it possible to change

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-13 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Quoting Sepp Tannhuber (2012-09-12 16:17:45) > my abook is working now. I don't know why it did not yesterday. Probably it > was > not a bug but rather something stupid with my config. Neither bug nor stupid config! It did not work because the completion is case sensitive. Is it possible to change

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Joseph Tannhuber
Dear Patrick > You can, but its not so comfortable at the moment: just use > `set From OtherAccount Realname ` Ok, let's try it right now. I think it would be the best to determine the sender account from the header of the answered mail. But I have no idea if it is possible. Thank you Joseph

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Hi Patrick, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? my abook is working now. I don't know why i

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Joseph Tannhuber
Dear Patrick > You can, but its not so comfortable at the moment: just use > `set From OtherAccount Realname ` Ok, let's try it right now. I think it would be the best to determine the sender account from the header of the answered mail. But I have no idea if it is possible. Thank you Joseph ___

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Christophe-Marie Duquesne
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Patrick Totzke wrote: > Good news everyone! I could not help but read the rest of your announcement in the voice of professor Farnsworth.

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Patrick Totzke
Quoting Sepp Tannhuber (2012-09-11 17:59:12) > Hi Patrick, > > thank you for answering and for this really good mail client! pleasure :) > > One reason I have not bothered to implement this so far is that in the long > > run, > > I want to have urwid Tree widgets as top level widgets in thread b

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Hi Patrick,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   my abook is working now. I don't know why i

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-12 Thread Christophe-Marie Duquesne
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Patrick Totzke wrote: > Good news everyone! I could not help but read the rest of your announcement in the voice of professor Farnsworth. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/lis

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-11 Thread Patrick Totzke
Quoting Sepp Tannhuber (2012-09-11 17:59:12) > Hi Patrick, > > thank you for answering and for this really good mail client! pleasure :) > > One reason I have not bothered to implement this so far is that in the long > > run, > > I want to have urwid Tree widgets as top level widgets in thread b

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-11 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Hi Patrick, thank you for answering and for this really good mail client! > One reason I have not bothered to implement this so far is that in the long > run, > I want to have urwid Tree widgets as top level widgets in thread buffers. > This would also allow "move to next sibling/parent" and so

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-11 Thread Patrick Totzke
Hi Sepp, welcome to alot :) Quoting Sepp Tannhuber (2012-09-10 19:55:00) > 1. As vi user I alway type gg/G to jump to the top/bottom. Is there a command > that I can > ? ?configure this way? I have not found a jump to top/bottom command in the > manual. Short Answer: This is not yet possible wit

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-11 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Hi Patrick, thank you for answering and for this really good mail client! > One reason I have not bothered to implement this so far is that in the long > run, > I want to have urwid Tree widgets as top level widgets in thread buffers. > This would also allow "move to next sibling/parent" and so

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-11 Thread Patrick Totzke
Hi Sepp, welcome to alot :) Quoting Sepp Tannhuber (2012-09-10 19:55:00) > 1. As vi user I alway type gg/G to jump to the top/bottom. Is there a command > that I can >    configure this way? I have not found a jump to top/bottom command in the > manual. Short Answer: This is not yet possible wit

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-10 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Dear all, I have been looking for a usable notmuch client for some time. Now I found the alot client which seems to be the best for my needs. I have used mutt-kz so far. And here are some questions: 1. As vi user I alway type gg/G to jump to the top/bottom. Is there a command that I can ? ?conf

Re: [alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-10 Thread Sepp Tannhuber
Dear all, I have been looking for a usable notmuch client for some time. Now I found the alot client which seems to be the best for my needs. I have used mutt-kz so far. And here are some questions: 1. As vi user I alway type gg/G to jump to the top/bottom. Is there a command that I can    conf

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-09 Thread Patrick Totzke
Good news everyone! I have just tagged alot v0.3.3; You can get a tarball here [0]. This version comes with lots of bugfixes and minor ui tweaks, most notably the ability to interpret command sequences and sequences of keypresses. It is now possible to overwrite default bindings which obsoletes t

[alot] announcing v0.3.3

2012-09-09 Thread Patrick Totzke
Good news everyone! I have just tagged alot v0.3.3; You can get a tarball here [0]. This version comes with lots of bugfixes and minor ui tweaks, most notably the ability to interpret command sequences and sequences of keypresses. It is now possible to overwrite default bindings which obsoletes t