[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-15 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:46:02 +, ingmar at exherbo.org wrote: > > ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will try to > > fix that. > > Oh, nevermind what I said earlier. > > Verify that /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. If not add it there. Then > run ldconfig > after

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-15 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:02:03 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:47:33 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel > wrote: > Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and > /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it doesn't find it when running > and exits saying libnot

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-15 Thread Ben Gamari
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:41:22 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel wrote: > I was just going to mail an updated series for this. I'd definitely like to > see > this upstream. > I agree. It would be quite nice to finally have to this merged. > I amended the first patch to install the notmuch.h header. > > Th

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-15 Thread Ben Gamari
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:41:22 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel wrote: > I was just going to mail an updated series for this. I'd definitely like to > see > this upstream. > I agree. It would be quite nice to finally have to this merged. > I amended the first patch to install the notmuch.h header. > > T

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-15 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:46:02 +, ing...@exherbo.org wrote: > > ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will try to > > fix that. > > Oh, nevermind what I said earlier. > > Verify that /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. If not add it there. Then > run ldconfig > after ins

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-15 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:02:03 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:47:33 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel > wrote: > Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and > /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it doesn't find it when running > and exits saying libno

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread ing...@exherbo.org
> ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will try to > fix that. Oh, nevermind what I said earlier. Verify that /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. If not add it there. Then run ldconfig after installing notmuch, then it should work. Doing everything with the package manag

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +, ingmar at exherbo.org wrote: > What's the value of LDPATH in your environment? It should contain > /usr/local/lib. > If it doesn't that's not an issue with the patch, but with your > installation/distro ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:47:33 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel wrote: > Here's my updated series for this. Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure during compilation. Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, i

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread ing...@exherbo.org
> Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure > during compilation. > Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and > /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it doesn't find it when running > and exits saying libnotmuch.so not found. Right, that was

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Ingmar Vanhassel
I'd very much like to see this upstream. Here's my updated series for this. I amended your first patch to make it install the notmuch.h header too. The second patch fixed some parallel make issue I had while testing your series. We discussed this ages ago on #notmuch, I don't remember the detai

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Ingmar Vanhassel
I was just going to mail an updated series for this. I'd definitely like to see this upstream. I amended the first patch to install the notmuch.h header. The second patch from a friend of mine fixes a parallel make issue I ran into when I tested one of your intiial patches. I ran this patch by yo

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread ingmar
> ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will try to > fix that. Oh, nevermind what I said earlier. Verify that /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. If not add it there. Then run ldconfig after installing notmuch, then it should work. Doing everything with the package manag

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +, ing...@exherbo.org wrote: > What's the value of LDPATH in your environment? It should contain > /usr/local/lib. > If it doesn't that's not an issue with the patch, but with your > installation/distro ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I wi

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread ingmar
> Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure > during compilation. > Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and > /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it doesn't find it when running > and exits saying libnotmuch.so not found. Right, that was

Re: [notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:47:33 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel wrote: > Here's my updated series for this. Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure during compilation. Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Ingmar Vanhassel
I'd very much like to see this upstream. Here's my updated series for this. I amended your first patch to make it install the notmuch.h header too. The second patch fixed some parallel make issue I had while testing your series. We discussed this ages ago on #notmuch, I don't remember the detai

[notmuch] (no subject)

2010-03-12 Thread Ingmar Vanhassel
I was just going to mail an updated series for this. I'd definitely like to see this upstream. I amended the first patch to install the notmuch.h header. The second patch from a friend of mine fixes a parallel make issue I ran into when I tested one of your intiial patches. I ran this patch by yo

[notmuch] (no subject)

2009-12-26 Thread da...@tethera.net
Thanks to Micah Anderson on IRC for pointing out that the previous version of this patch broke '?' in notmuch-show mode. This was arguably a bug in the notmuch help code, fixed in patch 2 of the series. I wouldn't be surprised if 'map-keymap' could be used other places in the code, but I kept thi

[notmuch] (no subject)

2009-12-26 Thread david
Thanks to Micah Anderson on IRC for pointing out that the previous version of this patch broke '?' in notmuch-show mode. This was arguably a bug in the notmuch help code, fixed in patch 2 of the series. I wouldn't be surprised if 'map-keymap' could be used other places in the code, but I kept thi

[notmuch] (no subject)

2009-11-24 Thread Bart Trojanowski
Hi, I find this patch useful for searching my mail. I realize that the option is horrendously long, and I would take any suggestions to shorten it or to use a short op, like -m. -Bart