[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:19 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > > Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? > > Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a > request into a daemon if the database isn't

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile wrote: > Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a request into a daemon if the database isn't currently available. But of course there are issues about whether the

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
It occurs to me that having generic ability to tell notmuch to retry until the DB isn't locked might useful. So I put the functionality in a script that can sit between notmuch and various clients. It will simplify my emacs setup, and improve it since emacs's handling of asynchronous processes

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
It occurs to me that having generic ability to tell notmuch to retry until the DB isn't locked might useful. So I put the functionality in a script that can sit between notmuch and various clients. It will simplify my emacs setup, and improve it since emacs's handling of asynchronous processes

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a request into a daemon if the database isn't currently available. But of course there are

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:19 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a request into a