On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:55:00 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Very cool. Oh, if you've got commits that don't compile on their own,
> you should squash them together (or fix it in some other way). Makes
> bisecting easier in the future.
Makes sense. I am still quite new to git, so excuse those
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:55:00 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Very cool. Oh, if you've got commits that don't compile on their own,
you should squash them together (or fix it in some other way). Makes
bisecting easier in the future.
Makes sense. I am still quite new to git, so
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of
> date formats, including things like "today", "thisweek", ISO and US date
> formats and month names. You can separate two dates with .. to make a
> range, or you
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of
> date formats, including things like "today", "thisweek", ISO and US date
> formats and month names. You can separate two dates with .. to make a
> range, or you
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:50:41 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard
> wrote:
> > Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of
> > date formats, including things like "today", "thisweek", ISO and US date
> > formats and
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of
date formats, including things like today, thisweek, ISO and US date
formats and month names. You can separate two dates with .. to make a
range,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of
date formats, including things like today, thisweek, ISO and US date
formats and month names. You can separate two dates with .. to make a
range,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:50:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of
date formats, including things like today, thisweek, ISO and US
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:26:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach
> does 2 things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps
> to be specified as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show
> date:2005..20060512 will
Sorry, very last mail from me on this issue. I squashed the patches into
3 distinct ones, and inherited a tree from cworth's master tree for
easier pulling (rather than basing it off my all-features branch). This
branch is here:
http://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature/commits/dateparser2
The patch previously sent can be considered my final attempt to a nicer
date parser. In addition to some testing, I have updated the
documentation to reflect the new syntax, and I have also added the
keyword 'now' as a possibility. So 'date:2002..now' (all mails from 2002
until now) or
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things:
1) it requires the prefix 'date:'
2) it allows dates to be specified in a flexible way. So a notmuch show
date:2005..2006-05-12 will find all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12.
Possible time formats:
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things:
1) it requires the prefix 'date:'
2) it allows dates to be specified in a flexible way. So a notmuch show
date:2005..2006-05-12 will find all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12.
Possible time formats:
The patch previously sent can be considered my final attempt to a nicer
date parser. In addition to some testing, I have updated the
documentation to reflect the new syntax, and I have also added the
keyword 'now' as a possibility. So 'date:2002..now' (all mails from 2002
until now) or
Sorry, very last mail from me on this issue. I squashed the patches into
3 distinct ones, and inherited a tree from cworth's master tree for
easier pulling (rather than basing it off my all-features branch). This
branch is here:
http://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature/commits/dateparser2
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things: 1) it requires the prefix 'date:'
2) it allows dates to be specified in some formats. So a notmuch show
date:2005..2006-05-12 will find all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12.
The code is probably not in a
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:26:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrot> + if (begin.size() == 8) {
> + int no_items;
> + no_items = sscanf(begin.c_str(), "%4i%2i%2i", , , );
> + if (no_items != 3)
> + return Xapian::BAD_VALUENO;
Also I have found that my sscanf skills are sourly
Please find in the previous mail attached my patch (against my current
all-feature branch, but should pretty much apply to current master too).
It is a proof-of-concept to make the date parser nicer. The following
searches work with this code:
notmuch show...
... date:2001..2010 (from beginning
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps to be specified
as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show date:2005..20060512 will find
all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12. The code is probably
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps to be specified
as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show date:2005..20060512 will find
all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12. The code is probably
Please find in the previous mail attached my patch (against my current
all-feature branch, but should pretty much apply to current master too).
It is a proof-of-concept to make the date parser nicer. The following
searches work with this code:
notmuch show...
... date:2001..2010 (from beginning
21 matches
Mail list logo
