[notmuch] [PATCH] Store documents for message-ids we haven't seen

2009-12-21 Thread Carl Worth
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:27:32 +, James Westby wrote: > One case that isn't handled is when we don't find the thread > id of the parent, but then find the message itself. I believe > this case shouldn't happen, but you never know. It really shouldn't happen

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Store documents for message-ids we haven't seen

2009-12-21 Thread Carl Worth
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:27:32 +, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net wrote: One case that isn't handled is when we don't find the thread id of the parent, but then find the message itself. I believe this case shouldn't happen, but you never know. It really shouldn't happen since

[notmuch] [PATCH] Store documents for message-ids we haven't seen

2009-12-20 Thread James Westby
When scanning the maildir there can be earlier messages in the thread that we haven't seen, either due to mail delays, or because they weren't sent. This can break the threading. Therefore we store stub documents for every message id we see, so that we can link them in to the threads. If we see

[notmuch] [PATCH] Store documents for message-ids we haven't seen

2009-12-20 Thread James Westby
When scanning the maildir there can be earlier messages in the thread that we haven't seen, either due to mail delays, or because they weren't sent. This can break the threading. Therefore we store stub documents for every message id we see, so that we can link them in to the threads. If we see