Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
> meant to be an exhaustive list. ?"blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
Without substantial analysis, "blame" alone is not sufficient - it
does not show which
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:42:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Please drop the above the next time.
Oops. Yes, I missed that.
> FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
> meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
Fair enough.
> You are
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was
> > not meant to be an exhaustive list. ?"blame -C -C -C" may tell you
> > more.
>
> Without substantial
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/1389/focus=140156
[...]
>> Meanwhile, a message ID lives forever and can be used in multiple
>> contexts.
>
> Oh, I never said "do not use message ID". I said "message ID alone is not
> good enough for most people".
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:42:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Please drop the above the next time.
Oops. Yes, I missed that.
FWIW, I only said _at least_ you need consent from them, and it was not
meant to be an exhaustive list. blame -C -C -C may tell you more.
Fair enough.
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/1389/focus=140156
[...]
Meanwhile, a message ID lives forever and can be used in multiple
contexts.
Oh, I never said do not use message ID. I said message ID alone is not
good enough for most
Carl Worth writes:
> From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Carl Worth
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
> GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
Please drop the above the next time.
> The
From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
This file has had no explicit license information noted in
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
FWIW, I only said _at least_ you need consent from them, and it was not
meant to be an exhaustive list. blame -C -C -C may tell you more.
Without substantial analysis, blame alone is not sufficient - it
does not
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Carl Worth wrote:
> The request for relicensing was presented to the git community in:
>
> ? ? ? ?Message-ID: <871vgmki4f.fsf at steelpick.localdomain>
>
> and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano, Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes
> Schindelin, Pierre Habouzit,
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
>
Carl Worth writes:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
> particular, the notmuch
This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
as with the rest of the git code base.
The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
particular, the notmuch project: http://notmuchmail.org)
This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
as with the rest of the git code base.
The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
particular, the notmuch project: http://notmuchmail.org)
15 matches
Mail list logo
