On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:46:59PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Stewart, you've worked most on this so far. Would you like to share
> your thoughts?
Just posted a new thread with my latest experiments. Things look
rather good from a storage size point of view. Still a few things to
work out
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:46:59PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
Stewart, you've worked most on this so far. Would you like to share
your thoughts?
Just posted a new thread with my latest experiments. Things look
rather good from a storage size point of view. Still a few things to
work out
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to call
> "notmuch" for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed (which can be
> quite often on an initial run, where most mails are likely to be read),
> this can take
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to call
notmuch for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed (which can be
quite often on an initial run, where most mails are likely to be read),
also sprach Sebastian Spaeth [2010.01.26.0249 +1300]:
> While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to
> call "notmuch" for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed
> (which can be quite often on an initial run, where most mails are
> likely to be read), this can take a long,
also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.25.1819 +1300]:
> You say "Ouch" but you should know Dovecot *already* does this. I
> don't mind interoperating with that.
>
> See http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, section "Issues
> with the specification", subsection "Locking". I term this theQ
>
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> be used if people wanted flags represented in Maildir filenames.
While notmuchsync fullfils my
also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928 +1300]:
> >I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP
> >server side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone,
> >and that means it needs to merge.
>
> It's not "merge" that's unsafe; that just builds a tree in the git
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> > used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> > be used if people
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928
> +1300]:
>>> I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP server
>>> side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone, and that
>>> means it needs to merge.
>>
>> It's not
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
be used if people wanted flags represented in Maildir filenames.
While
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net
wrote:
I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync
also sprach Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de [2010.01.26.0249 +1300]:
While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to
call notmuch for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed
(which can be quite often on an initial run, where most mails are
likely to be read), this can
also sprach Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org [2010.01.21.1928 +1300]:
I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP
server side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone,
and that means it needs to merge.
It's not merge that's unsafe; that just builds a tree in
also sprach Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org [2010.01.25.1819 +1300]:
You say Ouch but you should know Dovecot *already* does this. I
don't mind interoperating with that.
See http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, section Issues
with the specification, subsection Locking. I term
15 matches
Mail list logo
