[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-27 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:03:34 -0500, James Vasile wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson > wrote: > > > > Hey james, > > > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > > integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are >

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > Hey james, > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are > going to update your patch for notmuch.el ("Calls to notmuch get queued >

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:45 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > This stuff should go up on the wiki! There is a "Tips and Tricks for > using notmuch with Emacs" section, but more general things like James' > script and other people's

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread micah anderson
Hey james, i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are going to update your patch for notmuch.el ("Calls to notmuch get queued and executed asynchronously") to use this, or if you are going to have

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.02.26.1600 +0100]: > > Me too! :-) > > Isn't that what "folders" are? At least that's what they seem to me. I > define a specific search, give it a name, and save it as a folder. There's a 1:? relationship between folders and messages. I might want a message

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread micah anderson
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile wrote: > I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. I am pretty good at evangelizing notmuch and converted another person[0]... in doing so I realized I had to walk through a few issues to get them started. The initial

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:13:52 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > > Saved searches is a very good idea. I look forward to it. > > Me too! :-) Isn't that what "folders" are? At least that's what they seem to me. I define a specific search, give it a name, and save it as a folder. jamie. --

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
> Sometimes I manually override a rule-based tag. If automatic tagging > operated on old messages, overrides could be superseded. When I add > automatic tag rules, I first execute them manually and globally from the > command line. Right. With my global automatic tags, I don't want to be able

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
Sometimes I manually override a rule-based tag. If automatic tagging operated on old messages, overrides could be superseded. When I add automatic tag rules, I first execute them manually and globally from the command line. Right. With my global automatic tags, I don't want to be able to

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.02.26.1600 +0100]: Me too! :-) Isn't that what folders are? At least that's what they seem to me. I define a specific search, give it a name, and save it as a folder. There's a 1:∞ relationship between folders and messages. I

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread micah anderson
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. I am pretty good at evangelizing notmuch and converted another person[0]... in doing so I realized I had to walk through a few issues to get them started.

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: Hey james, i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are going to update your patch for notmuch.el (Calls to notmuch get

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:02:08 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > One distinction is that I have all of my "notmuch tag" commands operate > globally rather than just on new messages. One of the things that really > annoyed be about sup was that the support for automatic tagging worked > as a hook on

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile wrote: > I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. I'm currently using a script that does tagging not entirely unlike yours, (though my script isn't clever to retry a call to notmuch---believe it or not I'm just calling it manually

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
I'm slowly groping my way to using the notmuch emacs client as my routine MUA. As I coerce it into tagging and displaying the way I want, the next big question was automatically tagging things and getting them in to notmuch. I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. My solution

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
I'm slowly groping my way to using the notmuch emacs client as my routine MUA. As I coerce it into tagging and displaying the way I want, the next big question was automatically tagging things and getting them in to notmuch. I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. My solution

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. I'm currently using a script that does tagging not entirely unlike yours, (though my script isn't clever to retry a call to notmuch---believe it or not I'm

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:02:08 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: One distinction is that I have all of my notmuch tag commands operate globally rather than just on new messages. One of the things that really annoyed be about sup was that the support for automatic tagging worked as a