[notmuch] RPM spec file

2009-11-20 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:56:22 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie  wrote:
> I don't think that a separate Git branch makes sense, but maybe stuff
> like this should be in a subdirectory like "packaging/fedora", since I
> imagine that there will eventually be a need for "packaging/debian"
> etc. as well.

OK, Done.

Thanks again!

-Carl


[notmuch] RPM spec file

2009-11-19 Thread Carl Worth
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:53 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie"  
wrote:
> I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I
> came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS.  Once notmuch
> settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as
> an official package.  If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I
> don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages.

This sounds great, Jeffrey.

What makes the most sense for this file? Shall we just leave it in the
central repository? Or put it in its own rpm branch? I'm open to your
suggestions here.

-Carl


[notmuch] RPM spec file

2009-11-19 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Carl Worth  wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:53 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie"  
> wrote:
>> I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I
>> came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS. ?Once notmuch
>> settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as
>> an official package. ?If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I
>> don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages.
>
> This sounds great, Jeffrey.
>
> What makes the most sense for this file? Shall we just leave it in the
> central repository? Or put it in its own rpm branch? I'm open to your
> suggestions here.

I don't think that a separate Git branch makes sense, but maybe stuff
like this should be in a subdirectory like "packaging/fedora", since I
imagine that there will eventually be a need for "packaging/debian"
etc. as well.

-- 
Jeff Ollie


[notmuch] RPM spec file

2009-11-18 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I
came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS.  Once notmuch
settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as
an official package.  If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I
don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages.