also sprach Paul R [2010.01.28.0316 +1300]:
> As you see, I advocate a NotMuch <-> IMAP synchronisation ASAP :)
Given the limitations of IMAP (non-transactional, non-standard
keywords implementation, ?), I think chances of this are rapidly
diminishing, but I'd love to be proven wrong.
> First
REPOSTING, as the previous reply went to Gmane
> One may
> or may not like IMAP for good reasons, the fact is that it is here and
> has allowed users to read mails from various places and terminals,
> keeping important information synced. So I think that notmuch will have
> to live with that, and
On Wednesday 27 of January 2010 15:16:07 Paul R wrote:
> [...]
> Conclusion:
> ---
>
> As we have seen, this would allow most IMAP <-> MailDir <-> NotMuch
> synchronisation, without having to implement any kind of
> MailDir-specific logic inside notmuch. In fact, this notmuch-maildir
>
Hi,
before going into details, I'd like to tell you how much I like the
notmuch workflow, thank you for producing this nice piece of software !
Like most potential users, I can not really fully jump into notmuch
because of the current synchronisation issues with others MUA. One may
or may not
Hi,
before going into details, I'd like to tell you how much I like the
notmuch workflow, thank you for producing this nice piece of software !
Like most potential users, I can not really fully jump into notmuch
because of the current synchronisation issues with others MUA. One may
or may not
