[notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

2010-02-08 Thread Michal Sojka
On Saturday 06 of February 2010 22:45:32 Carl Worth wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's > > framework. If you are interested I'll do it. > > Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that. Thanks

Re: [notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

2010-02-08 Thread Michal Sojka
On Saturday 06 of February 2010 22:45:32 Carl Worth wrote: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's framework. If you are interested I'll do it. Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that.

[notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

2010-02-06 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches > which port Git's test framework for use with notmuch? Hi Michal, Ah, my mistake! That's what I get for working through my backlog chronologically. ;-) > That

[notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

2010-02-06 Thread Michal Sojka
On Friday 05 of February 2010 19:59:12 Carl Worth wrote: > Of course, I also pushed a set of tests to the test suite for this, (and > some new "notmuch search" tests while I was at it). Hi Carl, I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches which port Git's test

Re: [notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

2010-02-06 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches which port Git's test framework for use with notmuch? Hi Michal, Ah, my mistake! That's what I get for working through my backlog

[notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content)

2010-02-05 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:16:21 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > Clearly, some experimenting is needed. Dominik, if you can share the > large file, (with either me alone or with the whole list), a pointer to > where we could download it would be appreciated. Dominik replied to me privately and described