[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Bart Trojanowski
* Carl Worth [091121 15:20]: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:02 -0500, Bart Trojanowski > wrote: > > Perfect. How would you like to proceed with the initial integration? > > Pulling my tree, or me squashing all the changes into a single patch? > > Also, are you OK with where the files live (ie

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Bart Trojanowski
* Carl Worth [091121 15:14]: > So, well done! Thank you. > I think the only thing we noticed is that "filter" doesn't add the "and" > between the old and new search terms. But Chris may have more to comment > soon. I think I fixed that along the way. I'll verify. > I don't know how realistic

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:02 -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > Perfect. How would you like to proceed with the initial integration? > Pulling my tree, or me squashing all the changes into a single patch? > Also, are you OK with where the files live (ie under a vim directory). I'm glad to pull

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:39:09 -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature > rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my > work are here: Oh, hey! That's fantastic. I didn't expect to see a second notmuch

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. [Resend, first one missed the list] On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 14:14, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > * Stefan Schmidt [091121 14:06]: > > IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could > > use > > branches there too and it would be easier to find and test. And as

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 13:39, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > > I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature > rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my > work are here: Great stuff! I hoped for someone stepping up early to provide

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Bart Trojanowski
* Stefan Schmidt [091121 14:06]: > IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could > use > branches there too and it would be easier to find and test. And as notmuch is > still under heavy development its not a problem that the vim interface is as > well. Perfect.

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Bart Trojanowski
Hi list, I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my work are here: git://git.jukie.net/notmuch.git (on the vim branch)