[notmuch] notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back

2009-12-07 Thread Carl Worth
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:34:37 +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote: > Do I miss something? Or the function is just designed to work on a single node > not a list of them? The latter. The documentation for the function is wrong. Sorry about that. -Carl -- next part -- A non-text

[notmuch] notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back

2009-12-06 Thread Ruben Pollan
On 19:57, Fri 27 Nov 09, Carl Worth wrote: > (I'd like a verb that pairs better > with "advance" than the non-verb "back"---any suggestions)? What about regress? I'm not a native English speaker, so maybe someone can suggest something better. > So those won't need any new code. The one case that

[notmuch] notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back

2009-11-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:23:47 +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote: > Is it possible to implement notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back? > And I guess will make sense to have also notmuch_tags_back. > > This functions will do the oposite than notmuch_threads_advance and > notmuch_messages_advance.

[notmuch] notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back

2009-11-26 Thread Ruben Pollan
Is it possible to implement notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back? And I guess will make sense to have also notmuch_tags_back. This functions will do the oposite than notmuch_threads_advance and notmuch_messages_advance. So I can use them as iterators going back and forward. I didn't