[notmuch] reverse iterators

2010-03-22 Thread Ruben Pollan
On 21:07, Sun 21 Mar 10, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:23:20 +0100, Ruben Pollan > wrote: > > > > Adds support to reverse iteration on messages, threads and tags. To revew > > and > > think if makes sense to include them on notmuch or wait until they have a > > real > >

Re: [notmuch] reverse iterators

2010-03-22 Thread Ruben Pollan
On 21:07, Sun 21 Mar 10, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:23:20 +0100, Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net wrote: Adds support to reverse iteration on messages, threads and tags. To revew and think if makes sense to include them on notmuch or wait until they have a

[notmuch] reverse iterators

2010-03-21 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:23:20 +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote: > > Adds support to reverse iteration on messages, threads and tags. To revew and > think if makes sense to include them on notmuch or wait until they have a real > use. /me raises arm. Real use case here! Personally, I don't need the

Re: [notmuch] reverse iterators

2010-03-21 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:23:20 +0100, Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net wrote: Adds support to reverse iteration on messages, threads and tags. To revew and think if makes sense to include them on notmuch or wait until they have a real use. /me raises arm. Real use case here! Personally, I

[notmuch] reverse iterators

2010-03-20 Thread Ruben Pollan
Adds support to reverse iteration on messages, threads and tags. To revew and think if makes sense to include them on notmuch or wait until they have a real use. The patch 3 "Move the logic of threads iterator out of 'valid'" is just a reorganization of the code, I think it makes sense to

[notmuch] reverse iterators

2010-03-20 Thread Ruben Pollan
Adds support to reverse iteration on messages, threads and tags. To revew and think if makes sense to include them on notmuch or wait until they have a real use. The patch 3 Move the logic of threads iterator out of 'valid' is just a reorganization of the code, I think it makes sense to include