[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ben Gamari [2010.01.29.0949 +1300]: > > I guess I just dislike having to run notmuch new regularly, > > rather than integrating the database more closely with the mail > > flow. > > > Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. It still feels like a hack. It's a bit like making

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.01.28.1834 +1300]: > > That's not going to work so well if so. > > Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin... Now I get it. I was talking about id:20100114084713.GA22273 at harikalardiyari Sorry, I *am* new to notmuch ;) -- martin |

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Jed Brown
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:49:34 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. I haven't been following this thread closely so I hope this isn't too out of context. I agree that certain things like notmuch-new should go in the crontab, but I think that notmuch-new should

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 17:17:35 -0500 2010: > Cron-scheduling is a regular activity. I am talking about > event-based scheduling. incron could do that and fire up a process > every time a message is dropped into a directory, but notmuch > doesn't provide me with an

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.27.0603 > +1300]: > > > This is getting involved. > > > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these > > > complex and > > > context-sensitive decisions be

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]: > > This is getting involved. > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex > > and > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks? > > I think this idea is completely

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.26.1046 +1300]: > > For example, I might have: > > > > ~/.notmuch-config: > > > > [database] > > path=/home/pioto/mail > > ... > > [tags] > > pioto at pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch > > > > So, a 'tags' section, where each

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 15:39:10 -0500 2010: > also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes [2010.01.29.0132 > +1300]: > > >> [tags] > > >> inbox = +inbox,+unread > > >> sent = +sent > > >> drafts = +draft > > >> archive = -inbox > > > > > > This proposal, on the other hand,

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
2010/1/28 martin f krafft : > also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.26.1046 > +1300]: >> > For example, I might have: >> > >> > ~/.notmuch-config: >> > >> > ? ? [database] >> > ? ? path=/home/pioto/mail >> > ? ? ... >> > ? ? [tags] >> > ? ? pioto at pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch >> >

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
2010/1/28 martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net: also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.26.1046 +1300]: For example, I might have: ~/.notmuch-config:     [database]     path=/home/pioto/mail     ...     [tags]     pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch =

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com [2010.01.29.0132 +1300]: [tags] inbox = +inbox,+unread sent = +sent drafts = +draft archive = -inbox This proposal, on the other hand, is an interesting one, but when is it supposed to happen? It just feels wrong to make this

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 15:39:10 -0500 2010: also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com [2010.01.29.0132 +1300]: [tags] inbox = +inbox,+unread sent = +sent drafts = +draft archive = -inbox This proposal, on the other hand, is an

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Jed Brown
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:49:34 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. I haven't been following this thread closely so I hope this isn't too out of context. I agree that certain things like notmuch-new should go in the crontab, but I think that

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.26.1046 +1300]: For example, I might have: ~/.notmuch-config: [database] path=/home/pioto/mail ... [tags] pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch So, a 'tags' section, where each

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]: This is getting involved. Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex and context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks? I think this idea is

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote: also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]: This is getting involved. Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex and

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]: Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to notmuch show to see the conversation? That's not going to work so well if so. Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin... -- martin |

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:21 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote: also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]: Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to notmuch show to see the conversation? That's not going to work so well

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:32:02 -0600, Scott Robinson wrote: > Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: > > I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as > > a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to > >

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Robinson
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: > I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as > a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to > this. I think it's a very flexible idea that would help in a lot of >

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Robinson
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to this. I think it's a very flexible idea that would help in a lot of ways.

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-25 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:22:47 -0500 (EST), Mike Kelly wrote: > Similarly, provide a mechanism for correlating the folder name with > some set of tags, and change those tags as messages are moved around. > > For example, I might have: > > ~/.notmuch-config: > > [database] >

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-25 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:22:47 -0500 (EST), Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org wrote: Similarly, provide a mechanism for correlating the folder name with some set of tags, and change those tags as messages are moved around. For example, I might have: ~/.notmuch-config: [database]