Hi!
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:34:28 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
> > in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
> > debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is
> > hard to target at a
Hi!
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:34:28 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
> > in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
> > debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is
> > hard to target at
On Thu 13 Oct 2011 09:34, Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
>> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
>> debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is
>> hard to target at a single problem
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:09:47 +0300, Tomi Ollila
wrote:
> On Thu 13 Oct 2011 09:34, Jameson Graef Rollins
> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
>>> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard
>>> to
>>> debug, the main problem being that it ove
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:34:28 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
>> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard
to
>> debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and
is
>> hard to target at a single
Hey alip,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:30:51 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:55:30PM +0200, dtk wrote:
>>/me dislikes LD_LIBRARY_PATH :/
>
> May I ask why you dislike LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
debug, the main pro
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:09:47 +0300, Tomi Ollila
wrote:
> On Thu 13 Oct 2011 09:34, Jameson Graef Rollins
> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
>>> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard
>>> to
>>> debug, the main problem being that it ove
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:34:28 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
>> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard
to
>> debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and
is
>> hard to target at a single
On Thu 13 Oct 2011 09:34, Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
>> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
>> debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is
>> hard to target at a single problem
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
> debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is
> hard to target at a single problematic application.
I think it's fairly straightforward to prepen
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200, dtk wrote:
> in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
> debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is
> hard to target at a single problematic application.
I think it's fairly straightforward to prepen
Hey alip,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:30:51 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:55:30PM +0200, dtk wrote:
>>/me dislikes LD_LIBRARY_PATH :/
>
> May I ask why you dislike LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to
debug, the main pr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:55:30PM +0200, dtk wrote:
>
>Hey guys,
>
>I installed notmuch locally (~/.local) and now the python bindings fail to
>find the .so.
>
>Anyone happens to know how to set the rpath in the setup.cfg? Putting it
>in the [build] section doesn't work:
>
>~~~snip~~~
>$ python se
Hey guys,
I installed notmuch locally (~/.local) and now the python bindings fail to
find the .so.
Anyone happens to know how to set the rpath in the setup.cfg? Putting it
in the [build] section doesn't work:
~~~snip~~~
$ python setup.py install --prefix=$STOW/notmuch_python
running install
err
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:55:30PM +0200, dtk wrote:
Hey guys,
I installed notmuch locally (~/.local) and now the python bindings fail to
find the .so.
Anyone happens to know how to set the rpath in the setup.cfg? Putting it
in the [build] section doesn't work:
~~~snip~~~
$ python setup.py in
Hey guys,
I installed notmuch locally (~/.local) and now the python bindings fail to
find the .so.
Anyone happens to know how to set the rpath in the setup.cfg? Putting it
in the [build] section doesn't work:
~~~snip~~~
$ python setup.py install --prefix=$STOW/notmuch_python
running install
err
16 matches
Mail list logo