[BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

On 09/23/2013 07:23 PM, Simon Hirscher wrote: > Now, in order for you to test that behavior I'm going to send you a > signed and encrypted message because that should exactly reproduce the > bug, as long as you don't import my key (id EBACABE5 / > http://simonhirscher.de/public_key.asc) for

[BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Hi Daniel, First of all, sorry for the delay ? I had locked myself out from everything digital to study for my exams. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I just tried to replicate this, and i do not see this misbehavior. I'm > using notmuch 0.16-1 on a debian

Re: [BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Hi Daniel, First of all, sorry for the delay – I had locked myself out from everything digital to study for my exams. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: I just tried to replicate this, and i do not see this misbehavior. I'm using notmuch 0.16-1

Re: [BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

On 09/23/2013 07:23 PM, Simon Hirscher wrote: Now, in order for you to test that behavior I'm going to send you a signed and encrypted message because that should exactly reproduce the bug, as long as you don't import my key (id EBACABE5 / http://simonhirscher.de/public_key.asc) for signature

[BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Simon Hirscher writes: > > $ gpg --recv-keys > > $ notmuch show --decrypt id:xyz at example.com > > [?] > Hey there, > Now the decryption worked! > [?] > Is this related to Jamie's report? id:87obwrix8s.fsf at servo.finestructure.net Jamie, did you ever narrow down the gmime

Re: [BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Simon Hirscher pub...@simonhirscher.de writes: $ gpg --recv-keys sender's key $ notmuch show --decrypt id:x...@example.com […] Hey there, Now the decryption worked! […] Is this related to Jamie's report? id:87obwrix8s@servo.finestructure.net Jamie, did you ever narrow down the

[BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Hi Simon-- On 09/04/2013 06:01 PM, Simon Hirscher wrote: > This is now the second time the following has happened to me: [ decryption failure until adding sender's key] > Also, I should add that manually decrypting the message with gpg (i.e. > without using notmuch) already worked *before* I

[BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Dear notmuch developers, This is now the second time the following has happened to me: # $ notmuch show --decrypt id:xyz at example.com message{ id:xyz at example.com depth:0 match:1 excluded:0 filename:/home/simon/*** header{ John Doe (Today 21:52) (encrypted inbox new) Subject:

Re: [BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Hi Simon-- On 09/04/2013 06:01 PM, Simon Hirscher wrote: This is now the second time the following has happened to me: [ decryption failure until adding sender's key] Also, I should add that manually decrypting the message with gpg (i.e. without using notmuch) already worked *before* I

[BUG] Decryption fails if message was signed with an unknown key

Dear notmuch developers, This is now the second time the following has happened to me: # $ notmuch show --decrypt id:x...@example.com message{ id:x...@example.com depth:0 match:1 excluded:0 filename:/home/simon/*** header{ John Doe sen...@example.com (Today 21:52) (encrypted inbox new)

Decryption fails

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:35:49 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > Hey, Felix. Yeah, I unfortunately don't have any other suggestions > other than asking the gmime folks. Jeff replied and sent me a working patch :) Not sure yet how he prefers to publish the

Decryption fails

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:49:22 +0200, Felix Geller wrote: > Jeff replied and sent me a working patch :) Not sure yet how he prefers > to publish the patch, but the problem is fixed. That's great! What did Jeff say exactly? Is the patch to gmime 2.4? Did he mention that he was including them in

Decryption fails

On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:33:29 +0200, Felix Geller wrote: > I get the following trace when using show --decrypt to decrypt a > specific message (have to kill the process to actually get the trace): > > #0 0x0001006121a6 in poll () > #1 0x00010006d3d2 in gpg_ctx_op_step () > #2

Re: Decryption fails

On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:33:29 +0200, Felix Geller fgel...@gmail.com wrote: I get the following trace when using show --decrypt to decrypt a specific message (have to kill the process to actually get the trace): #0 0x0001006121a6 in poll () #1 0x00010006d3d2 in gpg_ctx_op_step () #2

Re: Decryption fails

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:35:49 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed Hey, Felix. Yeah, I unfortunately don't have any other suggestions other than asking the gmime folks. Jeff replied and sent me a working patch :) Not sure yet how he

Re: Decryption fails

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:49:22 +0200, Felix Geller fgel...@gmail.com wrote: Jeff replied and sent me a working patch :) Not sure yet how he prefers to publish the patch, but the problem is fixed. That's great! What did Jeff say exactly? Is the patch to gmime 2.4? Did he mention that he was

Decryption fails

On Tue, 31 May 2011 00:18:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > Hey, Felix. As David said, all crypto tests should be passing with > libgmime 2.4.24. It would probably be instructive to know which crypto > tests failed and why. Maybe you could supply some output from the > failed crypto

Decryption fails

On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:30:03 +0200, Felix Geller wrote: > Most of the test cases in crypto fail as well, but I'm not sure which > ones are actually supposed to work. Hey, Felix. As David said, all crypto tests should be passing with libgmime 2.4.24. It would probably be instructive to know

Re: Decryption fails

On Tue, 31 May 2011 00:18:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hey, Felix. As David said, all crypto tests should be passing with libgmime 2.4.24. It would probably be instructive to know which crypto tests failed and why. Maybe you could supply some output from

Decryption fails

Hi all, I'm using a version of notmuch based on cb84187 from the master branch on notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch and am accessing it mostly through the Emacs UI. Signature verification seems to work nicely, only decryption fails for any message/thread that I've tried it on. The respective notmuch

Decryption fails

On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:30:03 +0200, Felix Geller wrote: > starts eating all my CPU and doesn't return. Doing it on the command > line using gpg directly or going through Emacs' epa works fine. Most of > the test cases in crypto fail as well, but I'm not sure which ones are > actually supposed to

Decryption fails

Hi all, I'm using a version of notmuch based on cb84187 from the master branch on notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch and am accessing it mostly through the Emacs UI. Signature verification seems to work nicely, only decryption fails for any message/thread that I've tried it on. The respective notmuch

Re: Decryption fails

On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:30:03 +0200, Felix Geller fgel...@gmail.com wrote: starts eating all my CPU and doesn't return. Doing it on the command line using gpg directly or going through Emacs' epa works fine. Most of the test cases in crypto fail as well, but I'm not sure which ones are