Thanks, I'll try to take care of the concerns with the other 2 patches
at some point, but I haven't had as much free time lately as I'd like
to have.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:41 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org writes:
Hi,
Here's a second attempt at
Thanks, I'll try to take care of the concerns with the other 2 patches
at some point, but I haven't had as much free time lately as I'd like
to have.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:41 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Mike Kelly writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's a second attempt at adding FreeBSD support.
Mike Kelly writes:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a second attempt at adding FreeBSD support. Hopefully most of the
> concerns raised about the initial patch set have been addressed.
I pushed (finally) patches 1,2,4,5,6 and 8. The others either no longer
apply, or there were some outstanding issues in the
On Wed, May 30 2012, Mike Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a second attempt at adding FreeBSD support. Hopefully most of the
> concerns raised about the initial patch set have been addressed.
LGTM and patches apply, compiles fine and related tests pass.
Tomi
Hi,
Here's a second attempt at adding FreeBSD support. Hopefully most of the
concerns raised about the initial patch set have been addressed.
I'll send my "I don't have emacs" patches in a separate email.
Hi,
Here's a second attempt at adding FreeBSD support. Hopefully most of the
concerns raised about the initial patch set have been addressed.
I'll send my I don't have emacs patches in a separate email.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Wed, May 30 2012, Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org wrote:
Hi,
Here's a second attempt at adding FreeBSD support. Hopefully most of the
concerns raised about the initial patch set have been addressed.
LGTM and patches apply, compiles fine and related tests pass.
Tomi
Mike Kelly writes:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
>> Why do we need to explicitly declare Emacs dependency for tests? ?There
>> should be no need for it. ?We have "implicit" dependencies which are
>> declared once (see test_declare_external_prereq calls at the end
On Fri, May 25 2012, Mike Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These patches add some changes necessary for a clean build on FreeBSD,
> and for most of the tests to pass.
>
> Also mixed in are a few patches to disable emacs tests when you don't
> have emacs, along with tests that depend upon emacs. I could
Hi Mike.
Mike Kelly writes:
> Hi,
>
> These patches add some changes necessary for a clean build on FreeBSD,
> and for most of the tests to pass.
>
> Also mixed in are a few patches to disable emacs tests when you don't
> have emacs, along with tests that depend upon emacs. I could split those
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Why do we need to explicitly declare Emacs dependency for tests? ?There
> should be no need for it. ?We have "implicit" dependencies which are
> declared once (see test_declare_external_prereq calls at the end of
> test-lib.sh) and are
Hi,
These patches add some changes necessary for a clean build on FreeBSD,
and for most of the tests to pass.
Also mixed in are a few patches to disable emacs tests when you don't
have emacs, along with tests that depend upon emacs. I could split those
off onto a separate branch if required.
Hi,
These patches add some changes necessary for a clean build on FreeBSD,
and for most of the tests to pass.
Also mixed in are a few patches to disable emacs tests when you don't
have emacs, along with tests that depend upon emacs. I could split those
off onto a separate branch if required.
Hi Mike.
Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org writes:
Hi,
These patches add some changes necessary for a clean build on FreeBSD,
and for most of the tests to pass.
Also mixed in are a few patches to disable emacs tests when you don't
have emacs, along with tests that depend upon emacs. I could
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we need to explicitly declare Emacs dependency for tests? There
should be no need for it. We have implicit dependencies which are
declared once (see test_declare_external_prereq calls at the end of
On Fri, May 25 2012, Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org wrote:
Hi,
These patches add some changes necessary for a clean build on FreeBSD,
and for most of the tests to pass.
Also mixed in are a few patches to disable emacs tests when you don't
have emacs, along with tests that depend upon emacs. I
Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org writes:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we need to explicitly declare Emacs dependency for tests? There
should be no need for it. We have implicit dependencies which are
declared once (see
17 matches
Mail list logo
